You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Research 101: A process for developing local guidelines for ethical research in heavily researched communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12954-019-0315-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott D. Neufeld, Jule Chapman, Nicolas Crier, Samona Marsh, Jim McLeod, Lindsay A. Deane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 54% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 8% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,718,661
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#417
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,519
of 363,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.