↓ Skip to main content

Documentation of adverse events in non-commercial trials of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs to treat wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Documentation of adverse events in non-commercial trials of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs to treat wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
Published in
Trials, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-s1-a13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barnaby C Reeves, Wendy Underwood, Heike Cappel-Porter, Sarah Baos, Chris A Rogers, Michael Arnott, Simon P Harding, Usha Chakravarthy, Alex E Foss

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,155,513
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#5,269
of 5,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,116
of 242,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#42
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.