You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ethical challenges of integration across primary and secondary care: a qualitative and normative analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0386-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alex McKeown, Charlotte Cliffe, Arun Arora, Ann Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 67% |
Portugal | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,106,617
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#210
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,380
of 352,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.