↓ Skip to main content

Grading systems in head and neck dysplasia: their prognostic value, weaknesses and utility

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Neck Oncology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Grading systems in head and neck dysplasia: their prognostic value, weaknesses and utility
Published in
Head & Neck Oncology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1758-3284-1-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stijn Fleskens, Piet Slootweg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 1 1%
Unknown 24 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,594,277
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Head & Neck Oncology
#8
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,994
of 93,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Neck Oncology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them