You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal carcinoma [TIGER study]: study protocol of a multinational observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-019-5761-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliza R. C. Hagens, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Johanna W. van Sandick, Miguel A. Cuesta, Donald L. van der Peet, Joos Heisterkamp, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Camiel Rosman, Joris J. G. Scheepers, Meindert N. Sosef, Richard van Hillegersberg, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Magnus Nilsson, Jari Räsänen, Philippe Nafteux, Piet Pattyn, Arnulf H. Hölscher, Wolfgang Schröder, Paul M. Schneider, Christophe Mariette, Carlo Castoro, Luigi Bonavina, Riccardo Rosati, Giovanni de Manzoni, Sandro Mattioli, Josep Roig Garcia, Manuel Pera, Michael Griffin, Paul Wilkerson, M. Asif Chaudry, Bruno Sgromo, Olga Tucker, Edward Cheong, Krishna Moorthy, Thomas N. Walsh, John Reynolds, Yuji Tachimori, Haruhiro Inoue, Hisahiro Matsubara, Shin-ichi Kosugi, Haiquan Chen, Simon Y. K. Law, C. S. Pramesh, Shailesh P. Puntambekar, Sudish Murthy, Philip Linden, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Madhan K. Kuppusamy, K. Robert Shen, Gail E. Darling, Flávio D. Sabino, Peter P. Grimminger, Sybren L. Meijer, Jacques J. G. H. M. Bergman, Maarten C. C. M. Hulshof, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Banafsche Mearadji, Roel J. Bennink, Jouke T. Annema, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Suzanne S. Gisbertz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#986
of 9,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,964
of 366,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#35
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.