You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Misperceptions of patients and health workers regarding malaria elimination in the Brazilian Amazon: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2854-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felipe Leão Gomes Murta, Maxwell Oliveira Mendes, Vanderson Souza Sampaio, Abrahim Sena Baze Junior, Ximena Pamela Díaz-Bermúdez, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro, Marcus Vinícius Guimarães Lacerda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#13,678,959
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,088
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,350
of 352,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#54
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.