You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-3-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison L Kitson, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Gill Harvey, Brendan McCormack, Kate Seers, Angie Titchen |
| Abstract |
The PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) has proved to be a useful practical and conceptual heuristic for many researchers and practitioners in framing their research or knowledge translation endeavours. However, as a conceptual framework it still remains untested and therefore its contribution to the overall development and testing of theory in the field of implementation science is largely unquantified. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 1% |
| Canada | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1111 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 208 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 186 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 182 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 89 | 8% |
| Other | 70 | 6% |
| Other | 249 | 21% |
| Unknown | 183 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 288 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 191 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 169 | 14% |
| Psychology | 98 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 39 | 3% |
| Other | 141 | 12% |
| Unknown | 241 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,561,744
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#269
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,958
of 170,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.