You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of sedatives and opioids on trigger and cycling asynchronies throughout mechanical ventilation: an observational study in a large dataset from critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2531-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Candelaria de Haro, Rudys Magrans, Josefina López-Aguilar, Jaume Montanyà, Enrico Lena, Carles Subirà, Sol Fernandez-Gonzalo, Gemma Gomà, Rafael Fernández, Guillermo M. Albaiceta, Yoanna Skrobik, Umberto Lucangelo, Gastón Murias, Ana Ochagavia, Robert M. Kacmarek, Montserrat Rue, Lluís Blanch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 18 | 14% |
| Spain | 14 | 11% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Argentina | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 16% |
| Scientists | 10 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#535,314
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#337
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,109
of 363,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.