You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A critique of fluid bolus resuscitation in severe sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11154 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew K Hilton, Rinaldo Bellomo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 22% |
| Australia | 12 | 14% |
| United States | 12 | 14% |
| Canada | 9 | 11% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 24% |
| Scientists | 8 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 17% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 27% |
| Unknown | 19 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 77% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#650,928
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#431
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,572
of 254,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.