↓ Skip to main content

To do or not to do—balancing governance and professional autonomy to abandon low-value practices: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To do or not to do—balancing governance and professional autonomy to abandon low-value practices: a study protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0919-x
Authors

Henna Hasson, Per Nilsen, Hanna Augustsson, Sara Ingvarsson, Sara Korlén, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 5 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,836,738
of 17,824,880 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#497
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,451
of 270,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,824,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them