You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to understand knowledge broker decisions in selecting evidence for knowledge translation in low- and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0463-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theresa C. Norton, Daniela C. Rodriguez, Sara Willems |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Namibia | 1 | 5% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,449,325
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#349
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,812
of 355,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.