↓ Skip to main content

Comparative speed of kill after treatment with Simparica™(sarolaner) and Advantix®(imidacloprid + permethrin) against induced infestations of Dermacentor reticulatus on dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative speed of kill after treatment with Simparica™(sarolaner) and Advantix®(imidacloprid + permethrin) against induced infestations of Dermacentor reticulatus on dogs
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1377-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Csilla Becskei, Thomas Geurden, Heidi Erasmus, Otto Cuppens, Sean P. Mahabir, Robert H. Six

Abstract

Ticks are common ectoparasites that infest dogs globally. Acaricides with rapid and sustained speed of kill are critical to control infestations and to reduce the risk of disease transmission. This study evaluated the speed of kill for 5 weeks after a single dose of orally administered Simparica(™)(sarolaner) against induced infestations with Dermacentor reticulatus on dogs, compared to Advantix(®)Spot-on solution for dogs (imidacloprid + permethrin). Twenty four dogs were randomly allocated to treatment with either a placebo tablet, a sarolaner tablet (at 2 to 4 mg/kg) or with Advantix(®) as per label instructions. Dogs were treated on Day 0 and tick counts were performed in situ at 8 and 12 hours and with removal of the ticks at 24 hours after treatment and subsequent re-infestations on Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35. Acaricidal efficacy was determined at each time point relative to live tick counts from the placebo-treated dogs. Based on arithmetic (geometric) mean tick counts, the efficacy of sarolaner was ≥75.6 % (89.6 %) within 8 hours of treatment and tick counts were significantly lower than placebo and imidacloprid + permethrin-treated dogs (P < 0.0001), while imidacloprid + permethrin had no significant reduction (P ≥ 0.3990) at 8 or 12 hours after treatment. Sarolaner killed all ticks on the dogs within 24 hours after treatment, while imidacloprid + permethrin efficacy was only 48.1 %. After weekly re-infestations sarolaner significantly reduced the tick counts versus placebo within 8 hours on Days 7, 14 and 35 (P ≤ 0.0239), and at 12 hours and 24 hours (P ≤ 0.0079) until Day 35.Sarolaner efficacy was ≥95.8 % within 24 hours for 35 days. Significantly more live ticks (P ≤ 0.0451) were recovered from imidacloprid + permethrin-treated dogs than from sarolaner-treated dogs at 24 hours after infestation on all days. There were no sarolaner-related adverse reactions during the study. This study demonstrated that Simparica(™) had a faster and more consistent speed of kill against D. reticulatus compared to Advantix(®). The rapid and consistent efficacy within 24 hours for 5 weeks after a single oral dose of Simparica(™) provides effective and reliable control of D. reticulatus and reduces the risk of transmission of tick-borne diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 22%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,317,110
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,853
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,342
of 298,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#148
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.