You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Care Home Independent Prescribing Pharmacist Study (CHIPPS)—a non-randomised feasibility study of independent pharmacist prescribing in care homes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0465-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Inch, Frances Notman, Christine M. Bond, David P. Alldred, Antony Arthur, Annie Blyth, Amrit Daffu-O’Reilly, Joanna Ford, Carmel M. Hughes, Vivienne Maskrey, Anna Millar, Phyo K. Myint, Fiona M. Poland, Lee Shepstone, Arnold Zermansky, Richard Holland, David Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 49 | 52% |
| Australia | 9 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 56% |
| Scientists | 25 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2022.
All research outputs
#578,754
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#12
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,040
of 349,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.