↓ Skip to main content

Neurorestorative interventions involving bioelectronic implants after spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Bioelectronic Medicine, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurorestorative interventions involving bioelectronic implants after spinal cord injury
Published in
Bioelectronic Medicine, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42234-019-0027-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Newton Cho, Jordan W. Squair, Jocelyne Bloch, Grégoire Courtine

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 23%
Engineering 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#11,040,613
of 19,763,264 outputs
Outputs from Bioelectronic Medicine
#44
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,137
of 277,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioelectronic Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,763,264 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them