You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intestinal probiotics E. coli Nissle 1917 as a targeted vehicle for delivery of p53 and Tum-5 to solid tumors for cancer therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biological Engineering, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13036-019-0189-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lian He, Huijun Yang, Jianli Tang, Zhudong Liu, Yiyan Chen, Binghua Lu, Haocheng He, Sijia Tang, Yunjun Sun, Fei Liu, Xuezhi Ding, Youming Zhang, Shengbiao Hu, Liqiu Xia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,576,805
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#188
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,337
of 350,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.