↓ Skip to main content

Are humans the initial source of canine mange?

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are humans the initial source of canine mange?
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1456-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valérie Andriantsoanirina, Fang Fang, Frédéric Ariey, Arezki Izri, Françoise Foulet, Françoise Botterel, Charlotte Bernigaud, Olivier Chosidow, Weiyi Huang, Jacques Guillot, Rémy Durand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,505,004
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,353
of 6,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,447
of 314,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#30
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.