You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Causes of neonatal and maternal deaths in Dhaka slums: Implications for service delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-84 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fatema Khatun, Sabrina Rasheed, Allisyn C Moran, Ashraful M Alam, Mohammad Sohel Shomik, Munira Sultana, Nuzhat Choudhury, Mohammad Iqbal, Abbas Bhuiya |
Abstract |
Bangladesh has about 5.7 million people living in urban slums that are characterized by adverse living conditions, poor access to healthcare services and health outcomes. In an attempt to ensure safe maternal, neonatal and child health services in the slums BRAC started a programme, MANOSHI, in 2007. This paper reports the causes of maternal and neonatal deaths in slums and discusses the implications of those deaths for Maternal Neonatal and Child Health service delivery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 40 | 22% |
Researcher | 25 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 15% |
Unknown | 41 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Engineering | 7 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,911,735
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,267
of 14,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,637
of 246,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#88
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.