↓ Skip to main content

The JCVI standard operating procedure for annotating prokaryotic metagenomic shotgun sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The JCVI standard operating procedure for annotating prokaryotic metagenomic shotgun sequencing data
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, April 2010
DOI 10.4056/sigs.651139
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Tanenbaum, Johannes Goll, Sean Murphy, Prateek Kumar, Nikhat Zafar, Mathangi Thiagarajan, Ramana Madupu, Tanja Davidsen, Leonid Kagan, Saul Kravitz, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph

Abstract

The JCVI metagenomics analysis pipeline provides for the efficient and consistent annotation of shotgun metagenomics sequencing data for sampling communities of prokaryotic organisms. The process can be equally applied to individual sequence reads from traditional Sanger capillary electrophoresis sequences, newer technologies such as 454 pyrosequencing, or sequence assemblies derived from one or more of these data types. It includes the analysis of both coding and non-coding genes, whether full-length or, as is often the case for shotgun metagenomics, fragmentary. The system is designed to provide the best-supported conservative functional annotation based on a combination of trusted homology-based scientific evidence and computational assertions and an annotation value hierarchy established through extensive manual curation. The functional annotation attributes assigned by this system include gene name, gene symbol, GO terms, EC numbers, and JCVI functional role categories.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 3%
Brazil 5 3%
United States 4 3%
Denmark 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Argentina 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 120 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Computer Science 5 3%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 15 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#149
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,564
of 104,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.