↓ Skip to main content

Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) Study: a WSES observational study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) Study: a WSES observational study
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13017-019-0253-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Sartelli, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Francesco M. Labricciosa, Yoram Kluger, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Matti Tolonen, Cristian Tranà, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, Timothy Hardcastle, Renol M. Koshy, Ashraf Abbas, Ulaş Aday, A. R. K. Adesunkanmi, Adesina Ajibade, Lali Akhmeteli, Emrah Akın, Nezih Akkapulu, Alhenouf Alotaibi, Fatih Altintoprak, Dimitrios Anyfantakis, Boyko Atanasov, Goran Augustin, Constança Azevedo, Miklosh Bala, Dimitrios Balalis, Oussama Baraket, Suman Baral, Or Barkai, Marcelo Beltran, Roberto Bini, Konstantinos Bouliaris, Ana B. Caballero, Valentin Calu, Marco Catani, Marco Ceresoli, Vasileios Charalampakis, Asri Che Jusoh, Massimo Chiarugi, Nicola Cillara, Raquel Cobos Cuesta, Luigi Cobuccio, Gianfranco Cocorullo, Elif Colak, Luigi Conti, Yunfeng Cui, Belinda De Simone, Samir Delibegovic, Zaza Demetrashvili, Demetrios Demetriades, Ana Dimova, Agron Dogjani, Mushira Enani, Federica Farina, Francesco Ferrara, Domitilla Foghetti, Tommaso Fontana, Gustavo P. Fraga, Mahir Gachabayov, Grelpois Gérard, Wagih Ghnnam, Teresa Giménez Maurel, Georgios Gkiokas, Carlos A. Gomes, Ali Guner, Sanjay Gupta, Andreas Hecker, Elcio S. Hirano, Adrien Hodonou, Martin Hutan, Igor Ilaschuk, Orestis Ioannidis, Arda Isik, Georgy Ivakhov, Sumita Jain, Mantas Jokubauskas, Aleksandar Karamarkovic, Robin Kaushik, Jakub Kenig, Vladimir Khokha, Denis Khokha, Jae Il Kim, Victor Kong, Dimitris Korkolis, Vitor F. Kruger, Ashok Kshirsagar, Romeo Lages Simões, Andrea Lanaia, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Pedro Leão, Miguel León Arellano, Holger Listle, Andrey Litvin, Aintzane Lizarazu Pérez, Eudaldo Lopez-Tomassetti Fernandez, Eftychios Lostoridis, Davide Luppi, Gustavo M. Machain V, Piotr Major, Dimitrios Manatakis, Marianne Marchini Reitz, Athanasios Marinis, Daniele Marrelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Sanjay Marwah, Michael McFarlane, Mirza Mesic, Cristian Mesina, Nickos Michalopoulos, Evangelos Misiakos, Felipe Gonçalves Moreira, Ouadii Mouaqit, Ali Muhtaroglu, Noel Naidoo, Ionut Negoi, Zane Nikitina, Ioannis Nikolopoulos, Gabriela-Elisa Nita, Savino Occhionorelli, Iyiade Olaoye, Carlos A. Ordoñez, Zeynep Ozkan, Ajay Pal, Gian M. Palini, Kyriaki Papageorgiou, Dimitris Papagoras, Francesco Pata, Michał Pędziwiatr, Jorge Pereira, Gerson A. Pereira Junior, Gennaro Perrone, Tadeja Pintar, Magdalena Pisarska, Oleksandr Plehutsa, Mauro Podda, Gaetano Poillucci, Martha Quiodettis, Tuba Rahim, Daniel Rios-Cruz, Gabriel Rodrigues, Dmytry Rozov, Boris Sakakushev, Ibrahima Sall, Alexander Sazhin, Miguel Semião, Taanya Sharda, Vishal Shelat, Giovanni Sinibaldi, Dmitrijs Skicko, Matej Skrovina, Dimitrios Stamatiou, Marco Stella, Marcin Strzałka, Ruslan Sydorchuk, Ricardo A. Teixeira Gonsaga, Joel Noutakdie Tochie, Gia Tomadze, Lara Ugoletti, Jan Ulrych, Toomas Ümarik, Mustafa Y. Uzunoglu, Alin Vasilescu, Osborne Vaz, Andras Vereczkei, Nutu Vlad, Maciej Walędziak, Ali I. Yahya, Omer Yalkin, Tonguç U. Yilmaz, Ali Ekrem Ünal, Kuo-Ching Yuan, Sanoop K. Zachariah, Justas Žilinskas, Maurizio Zizzo, Vittoria Pattonieri, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Fausto Catena

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Master 13 7%
Other 57 29%
Unknown 64 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 78 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#216
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,931
of 363,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.