You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Innovative matrix for applying a food systems approach for developing interventions to address nutrient deficiencies in indigenous communities in India: a study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6963-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suparna Ghosh-Jerath, Shauna Downs, Archna Singh, Santanu Paramanik, Gail Goldberg, Jessica Fanzo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| Kenya | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 98 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 106 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,625,924
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,101
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,098
of 344,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#154
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.