↓ Skip to main content

Effect of sunlight exposure on cognitive function among depressed and non-depressed participants: a REGARDS cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,509)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
10 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of sunlight exposure on cognitive function among depressed and non-depressed participants: a REGARDS cross-sectional study
Published in
Environmental Health, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-8-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shia T Kent, Leslie A McClure, William L Crosson, Donna K Arnett, Virginia G Wadley, Nalini Sathiakumar

Abstract

Possible physiological causes for the effect of sunlight on mood are through the suprachiasmatic nuclei and evidenced by serotonin and melatonin regulation and its associations with depression. Cognitive function involved in these same pathways may potentially be affected by sunlight exposure. We evaluated whether the amount of sunlight exposure (i.e. insolation) affects cognitive function and examined the effect of season on this relationship.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Other 14 8%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 18%
Psychology 23 13%
Environmental Science 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 50 28%
Unknown 45 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 248. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#125,365
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#47
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264
of 111,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.