The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of sunlight exposure on cognitive function among depressed and non-depressed participants: a REGARDS cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-8-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shia T Kent, Leslie A McClure, William L Crosson, Donna K Arnett, Virginia G Wadley, Nalini Sathiakumar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 49 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 15% |
| Psychology | 24 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 26% |
| Unknown | 72 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#128,584
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#51
of 1,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264
of 125,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them