You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1082-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bram Duyx, Gerard M. H. Swaen, Miriam J. E. Urlings, Lex M. Bouter, Maurice P. Zeegers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 20% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 55% |
| Scientists | 13 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,329,116
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#183
of 2,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,961
of 344,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.