↓ Skip to main content

The impact of social norms interventions on clinical behaviour change among health workers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of social norms interventions on clinical behaviour change among health workers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1077-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Cotterill, Rachael Powell, Sarah Rhodes, Benjamin Brown, Jane Roberts, Mei Yee Tang, Jack Wilkinson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Psychology 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 22 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,650,920
of 15,793,291 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#341
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,311
of 261,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,793,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them