You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Supreme laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation for airway management during general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-019-0792-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Yu Yao, Shi Yang Li, Yong Jin Yuan, Hon Sen Tan, Nian-Lin R. Han, Rehena Sultana, Pryseley N. Assam, Alex Tiong-Heng Sia, Ban Leong Sng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,048,903
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#599
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,504
of 346,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#17
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.