↓ Skip to main content

Appropriate prescribing in nursing homes demonstration project (APDP) study protocol: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial and mixed methods process evaluation of an Ontario policy-maker initiative to…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appropriate prescribing in nursing homes demonstration project (APDP) study protocol: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial and mixed methods process evaluation of an Ontario policy-maker initiative to improve appropriate prescribing of antipsychotics
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13012-016-0410-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Desveaux, Tara Gomes, Mina Tadrous, Lianne Jeffs, Monica Taljaard, Jess Rogers, Chaim M. Bell, Noah M. Ivers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Librarian 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Psychology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,189
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,468
of 317,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#37
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.