↓ Skip to main content

How does feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How does feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1097-2
Authors

Joachim Rapin, Joanie Pellet, Cedric Mabire, Sylvie Gendron, Carl-Ardy Dubois

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Unknown 16 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,155,924
of 15,856,856 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#911
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,558
of 262,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,856,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them