↓ Skip to main content

Cueing healthier alternatives for take-away: a field experiment on the effects of (disclosing) three nudges on food choices

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cueing healthier alternatives for take-away: a field experiment on the effects of (disclosing) three nudges on food choices
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7323-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy T. L. Cheung, Marleen Gillebaart, Floor M. Kroese, David Marchiori, Bob M. Fennis, Denise T. D. De Ridder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 37 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 40 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,156,190
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,419
of 15,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,947
of 346,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#67
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.