↓ Skip to main content

Onchocerciasis, an undiagnosed disease in Mozambique: identifying research opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Onchocerciasis, an undiagnosed disease in Mozambique: identifying research opportunities
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1468-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia V. Noormahomed, Kevan Akrami, Carmen Mascaró-Lazcano

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to summarise and critically review the available data about onchocerciasis in Mozambique, in order to report epidemiological and clinical aspects related to the disease and identify gaps in knowledge. The paper is intended to raise awareness of the existence and importance of this disease and to define research priorities. We examined the scarce epidemiological data at our disposal: two diagnostic studies in 1997 and 1998 (first reports on the existence of onchocerciasis in Mozambique), and two Rapid Epidemiological Mapping of Onchocerciasis (REMO) surveys in 2001 and 2007. We examined differences in study designs and methodologies as well as the differing geographical locations to explain the divergence in findings among the studies. Evidence indicates that onchocerciasis is hypoendemic in Mozambique (with national and imported cases), but still largely remains an undiagnosed illness. There is no awareness of the clinical aspects of the disease and nor of the differential diagnosis with lepromatous leprosy and dermatitis caused by Scabies spp. The use of skin biopsy and a symptom screening questionnaire, combined with nodule rate, in the first two studies may have captured even atypical or subacute presentations. Both REMO surveys relied solely on nodule detection and in the six years between the two studies, the prevalence of nodules detected more than doubled. The epidemiology and clinical aspects of the disease are unknown in Mozambique. Since the last REMO took place in 2007 and since the population is subject to large-scale movement and displacement, it is important to develop tools to identify and analyse populations that are at high risk for onchocerciasis. Cases of onchocerciasis may be misdiagnosed as leprosy or scabies that fail to improve despite being subjected to treatment against leprosy. Techniques to enable a differential diagnosis need to be established by training health professionals on the recognition of this undiagnosed disease. It is equally necessary to identify the blackfly vectors and where they breed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Lecturer 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 8 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,340,502
of 19,467,557 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,171
of 4,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,730
of 275,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,467,557 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them