You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Laxative effects of partially defatted flaxseed meal on normal and experimental constipated mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiqu Xu, Xiaoqi Zhou, Chang Chen, Qianchun Deng, Qingde Huang, Jin'e Yang, Nianhong Yang, Fenghong Huang |
Abstract |
Constipation is a very common health problem in the world. Intake of sufficient amount of dietary fibers is a cornerstone in the prevention and treatment of constipation. As a traditional medicine, flaxseed has been used to treat constipation for centuries, but the controlled trials are rare. The purpose of the present study was to assess that whether partially defatted flaxseed meal (PDFM) has the potential role to facilitate fecal output in normal and experimental constipated mice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,536,734
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#251
of 3,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,000
of 169,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.