↓ Skip to main content

Sample size calculation while controlling false discovery rate for differential expression analysis with RNA-sequencing experiments

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sample size calculation while controlling false discovery rate for differential expression analysis with RNA-sequencing experiments
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-0994-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ran Bi, Peng Liu

Abstract

RNA-Sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments have been popularly applied to transcriptome studies in recent years. Such experiments are still relatively costly. As a result, RNA-seq experiments often employ a small number of replicates. Power analysis and sample size calculation are challenging in the context of differential expression analysis with RNA-seq data. One challenge is that there are no closed-form formulae to calculate power for the popularly applied tests for differential expression analysis. In addition, false discovery rate (FDR), instead of family-wise type I error rate, is controlled for the multiple testing error in RNA-seq data analysis. So far, there are very few proposals on sample size calculation for RNA-seq experiments. In this paper, we propose a procedure for sample size calculation while controlling FDR for RNA-seq experimental design. Our procedure is based on the weighted linear model analysis facilitated by the voom method which has been shown to have competitive performance in terms of power and FDR control for RNA-seq differential expression analysis. We derive a method that approximates the average power across the differentially expressed genes, and then calculate the sample size to achieve a desired average power while controlling FDR. Simulation results demonstrate that the actual power of several popularly applied tests for differential expression is achieved and is close to the desired power for RNA-seq data with sample size calculated based on our method. Our proposed method provides an efficient algorithm to calculate sample size while controlling FDR for RNA-seq experimental design. We also provide an R package ssizeRNA that implements our proposed method and can be downloaded from the Comprehensive R Archive Network ( http://cran.r-project.org ).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 235 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 18%
Student > Master 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Mathematics 12 5%
Computer Science 9 4%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 61 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,188,909
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#526
of 7,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,332
of 306,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#19
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.