↓ Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes and healthcare utilization following critical illness – a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term outcomes and healthcare utilization following critical illness – a population-based study
Published in
Critical Care, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1248-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. D. Hill, R. A. Fowler, R. Pinto, M. S. Herridge, B. H. Cuthbertson, D. C. Scales

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and health service utilization among critically ill patients. We also determined whether these outcomes differed according to demographic and clinical characteristics. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (age ≥18 years) who survived admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) in Ontario, Canada, between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2012, excluding isolated admissions to step-down or intermediate ICUs, coronary care ICUs, or cardiac surgery ICUs. Adults (age ≥18 years) who survived an acute hospitalization that did not include an ICU stay formed the comparator group. The primary outcome was mortality following hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were healthcare utilization, including emergency room admissions and hospital readmissions during follow-up. Over the study interval, 500,124 patients were admitted to ICUs and 420,187 (84 %) survived to hospital discharge. Median follow-up for survivors was 5.3 (interquartile range 2.5, 8.2) years. Patients admitted to an ICU were more likely to subsequently visit the emergency department, be readmitted to the hospital and ICU, receive home care support, require rehabilitation, and be admitted for long-term care. Those requiring more resources within the ICU required more resources after discharge. One-third of patients admitted to the ICU died during long-term follow-up, with overall probabilities of death of 11 % and 29 % at 1 year and 5 years, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, there was an increasing hazard of death with increasing age, reaching a hazard ratio of 18.08 (95 % confidence interval 16.60-19.68) for those ≥85 years of age compared with those aged 18-24 years. Healthcare utilization after hospital discharge was higher among ICU patients, and also among those requiring more healthcare resources during their ICU admission, than among all hospitalized patients as a group. One-third of ICU patients died within the 5 years following discharge, and age was the most influential determinant of outcome. These findings should help target post-ICU discharge services for high-risk groups and better inform goals-of-care discussions for elderly critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 266 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 14%
Researcher 30 11%
Other 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 69 26%
Unknown 65 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 75 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,362,138
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,173
of 6,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,021
of 315,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#34
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.