You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12905-019-0792-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Azusa Arimoto, Etsuko Tadaka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,040,705
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#180
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,062
of 346,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.