You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increasing organ donation via anticipated regret (INORDAR): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronan E O'Carroll, Eamonn Ferguson, Peter C Hayes, Lee Shepherd |
| Abstract |
Throughout the world there is an insufficient supply of donor organs to meet the demand for organ transplantations. This paper presents a protocol for a randomised controlled trial, testing whether a simple, theory-based anticipated regret manipulation leads to a significant increase in posthumous organ donor registrations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2012.
All research outputs
#5,405,695
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,306
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,711
of 156,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#46
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.