↓ Skip to main content

The expression of CD123 can decrease with basophil activation: implications for the gating strategy of the basophil activation test

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The expression of CD123 can decrease with basophil activation: implications for the gating strategy of the basophil activation test
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13601-016-0100-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra F. Santos, Natalia Bécares, Alick Stephens, Victor Turcanu, Gideon Lack

Abstract

Basophil activation test (BAT) reproduces IgE-mediated allergic reactions in vitro and has been used as a diagnostic test. Different markers can be used to identify basophils in whole blood and have implications for the outcome of the test. We aimed to assess changes in the expression of CD123 and HLA-DR following basophil activation and to select the best gating strategy for BAT using these markers. BAT was performed in whole blood from 116 children. Peanut extract, anti-IgE, anti-FcεRI or formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanin (fMLP) was used for stimulation. Surface expression of CD123, HLA-DR, CD63 and CD203c was evaluated by flow cytometry. In some cases, gating on CD123+/HLA-DR- led to the loss-to-analysis of basophils in conditions where basophils were activated. Adding CD203c as an identification marker restored the cell number. Basophils remained HLA-DR-negative with activation. CD123 expression decreased following stimulation with fMLP (n = 116, p < 0.001), anti-IgE (n = 104, p < 0.001) and peanut (n = 42, p < 0.001). The decrease in the mean fluorescence intensity of CD123 correlated with the up-regulation of basophil activation markers, CD63 (rs = -0.31, p < 0.001) and CD203c (rs = -0.35, p < 0.001). BAT to peanut gating basophils on CD203c+/CD123+/HLA-DR- reduced the false-negatives (1 vs. 5 %) and showed a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to using CD123+/HLA-DR- (97 vs. 91 %). CD203c+ appeared as an alternative gating strategy allowing two-colour BAT. Basophils of a subset of patients down-regulate CD123 with activation. The use of CD203c before gating on CD123+/HLA-DR- cells or in isolation ensures the identification of the entire basophil population and accurate assessment of basophil activation, with important diagnostic implications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 14 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,464,131
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#301
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,571
of 300,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.