↓ Skip to main content

Relevance of animal models to human tardive dyskinesia

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relevance of animal models to human tardive dyskinesia
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1744-9081-8-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre J Blanchet, Marie-Thérèse Parent, Pierre H Rompré, Daniel Lévesque

Abstract

Tardive dyskinesia remains an elusive and significant clinical entity that can possibly be understood via experimentation with animal models. We conducted a literature review on tardive dyskinesia modeling. Subchronic antipsychotic drug exposure is a standard approach to model tardive dyskinesia in rodents. Vacuous chewing movements constitute the most common pattern of expression of purposeless oral movements and represent an impermanent response, with individual and strain susceptibility differences. Transgenic mice are also used to address the contribution of adaptive and maladaptive signals induced during antipsychotic drug exposure. An emphasis on non-human primate modeling is proposed, and past experimental observations reviewed in various monkey species. Rodent and primate models are complementary, but the non-human primate model appears more convincingly similar to the human condition and better suited to address therapeutic issues against tardive dyskinesia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Neuroscience 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#23,010,126
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#362
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,012
of 169,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.