You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Survey context and question wording affects self reported annoyance due to road traffic noise: a comparison between two cross-sectional studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-11-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theo Bodin, Jonas Björk, Evy Öhrström, Jonas Ardö, Maria Albin |
| Abstract |
Surveys are a common way to measure annoyance due to road traffic noise, but the method has some draw-backs. Survey context, question wording and answer alternatives could affect participation and answers and could have implications when comparing studies and/or performing pooled analyses. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in annoyance reporting due to road traffic noise in two types of surveys of which one was introduced broadly and the other with the clearly stated aim of investigating noise and health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Psychology | 6 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2012.
All research outputs
#16,919,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,200
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,751
of 168,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.