↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study of the associations between the traditional Japanese diet and nutrient intakes: the NILS-LSA project

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study of the associations between the traditional Japanese diet and nutrient intakes: the NILS-LSA project
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12937-019-0468-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu Zhang, Rei Otsuka, Yasutake Tomata, Hiroshi Shimokata, Chikako Tange, Makiko Tomida, Yukiko Nishita, Sanae Matsuyama, Ichiro Tsuji

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#12,690,857
of 19,798,657 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,049
of 1,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,757
of 277,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,798,657 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them