You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Loss of base-to-apex circumferential strain gradient assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Fabry disease: relationship to T1 mapping, late gadolinium enhancement and hypertrophy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-019-0557-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shobhit Mathur, John G. Dreisbach, Gauri R. Karur, Robert M. Iwanochko, Chantal F. Morel, Syed Wasim, Elsie T. Nguyen, Bernd J. Wintersperger, Kate Hanneman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 53% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#16,345,315
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,007
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,095
of 360,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.