You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of ecotechnologies for recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate and effectiveness of the recovery products as fertilisers: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-019-0173-3 |
| Authors |
Biljana Macura, Solveig L. Johannesdottir, Mikołaj Piniewski, Neal R. Haddaway, Elisabeth Kvarnström |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 22% |
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 30 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,067,342
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#204
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,520
of 360,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.