↓ Skip to main content

Critical care resources in the Solomon Islands: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical care resources in the Solomon Islands: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-12-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mia Westcott, Alexandra LC Martiniuk, Robert A Fowler, Neill KJ Adhikari, Tenneth Dalipanda

Abstract

There are minimal data available on critical care case-mix, care processes and outcomes in lower and middle income countries (LMICs). The objectives of this paper were to gather data in the Solomon Islands in order to gain a better understanding of common presentations of critical illness, available hospital resources, and what resources would be helpful in improving the care of these patients in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#16,436
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,811
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#210
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.