↓ Skip to main content

Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mosquito host choices on livestock amplifiers of Rift Valley fever virus in Kenya
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1473-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Tchouassi, Robinson O. K. Okiro, Rosemary Sang, Lee W. Cohnstaedt, David Scott McVey, Baldwyn Torto

Abstract

Animal hosts may vary in their attraction and acceptability as components of the host location process for assessing preference, and biting rates of vectors and risk of exposure to pathogens. However, these parameters remain poorly understood for mosquito vectors of the Rift Valley fever (RVF), an arboviral disease, and for a community of mosquitoes. Using three known livestock amplifiers of RVF virus including sheep, goat and cattle as bait in enclosure traps, we investigated the host-feeding patterns for a community of mosquitoes in Naivasha, an endemic area of Rift Valley fever (RVF), in a longitudinal study for six months (June-November 2015). We estimated the incidence rate ratios (IRR) where mosquitoes chose cow over the other livestock hosts by comparing their attraction (total number collected) and engorgement rate (proportion freshly blood-fed) on these hosts. Overall, significant differences were observed in host preference parameters for attraction (F2,15 = 4.1314, P = 0.037) and engorgement (F2,15 = 6.24, P = 0.01) with cow consistently attracting about 3-fold as many mosquitoes as those engorged on sheep (attraction: IRR = 2.9, 95 % CI 1.24-7.96; engorgement: IRR = 3.2, 95 % CI = 1.38-7.38) or goat (attraction: IRR = 2.7, 95 % CI 1.18-7.16; engorgement: IRR = 3.28, 95 % CI 1.47-7.53). However, there was no difference between the attraction elicited by sheep and goat (IRR = 1.08; 95 % CI 0.35-3.33 or engorgement rate (IRR = 0.96, 95 % CI  0.36-2.57). Despite the overall attractive pattern to feed preferentially on cows, the engorgement rate was clearly independent of the number attracted for certain mosquito species, notably among the flood water Aedes spp., largely incriminated previously as primary vectors of RVF. Our findings suggest that insecticide treated cattle (ITC) can be exploited in enclosure traps as contact bait in the monitoring and control of disease-causing mosquitoes in RVF endemic areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 35 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,843,597
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,083
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,729
of 301,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#103
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.