↓ Skip to main content

Ethical considerations in conducting surgical research in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethical considerations in conducting surgical research in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13017-019-0259-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Doig, Stacey A Page, Jessica L. McKee, Ernest E. Moore, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Rosemary Carroll, John C. Marshall, Peter D Faris, Matti Tolonen, Fausto Catena, Federico Coccolini, Massimo Sartelli, Luca Ansaloni, Sam F. Minor, Bruno M. Peirera, Jose J Diaz, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 37 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 28%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 40 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#339
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,422
of 360,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.