You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics, quality of life and control of respiratory allergic diseases caused by house dust mites (HDMs) in Spain: a cross‐sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-019-0276-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beristain Ana, Fernando de la Torre, EpidMite Study Group, María Teresa Aldunate, José Antonio Álvarez, Miguel Añó, Gonzalo Campos, Victoria Cardona, Sergia Cruz, Virginia De Luque, Joan Domenech, Elena Escudero, Agustín Fernández, Javier Figueroa, Pere Gaig, Belén Gómez, Genoveva González, Diego Gutiérrez, Javier Iglesias, Vicente Jover, Raquel Kraemer, Tania Linares, Damián López, Sara López Freire, Estrella Llamas, Alfons Malet, Antonio Maraví, Joaquín Martín‐Lázaro, Montserrat Molina, Javier Montoro, Carmen Moreno, Carmen Moya, Rafael Pamies, Laura Pérez‐Pastor, Dolores Quiñones, Isabella Raducán, Fernando Rodríguez, Ramón Rodríguez‐Pacheco, Idoia Rodríguez‐Zuazo, María Rueda, Cesárea Sánchez, Inmaculada Sánchez‐Guerrero, Inmaculada Sánchez‐Machín, Carmen Vidal, Juan José Zapata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 58% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,079,935
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#384
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,575
of 345,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.