You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-7-40 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leon Bax, Ly-Mee Yu, Noriaki Ikeda, Karel GM Moons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 318 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 20% |
| Researcher | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Professor | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 93 | 27% |
| Unknown | 31 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 21% |
| Psychology | 54 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 26% |
| Unknown | 48 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,686,631
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,761
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,478
of 70,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.