You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is this patient really “(un)stable”? How to describe cardiovascular dynamics in critically ill patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2551-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-Louis Vincent, Maurizio Cecconi, Bernd Saugel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 9% |
Spain | 7 | 7% |
Mexico | 7 | 7% |
Chile | 4 | 4% |
Colombia | 4 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Japan | 3 | 3% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 19% |
Unknown | 42 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 68 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 18% |
Scientists | 13 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 14 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#632,798
of 24,156,282 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#443
of 6,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,949
of 348,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,156,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.