↓ Skip to main content

De novo sequencing of circulating miRNAs identifies novel markers predicting clinical outcome of locally advanced breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De novo sequencing of circulating miRNAs identifies novel markers predicting clinical outcome of locally advanced breast cancer
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiwei Wu, George Somlo, Yang Yu, Melanie R Palomares, Arthur Xuejun Li, Weiying Zhou, Amy Chow, Yun Yen, John J Rossi, Harry Gao, Jinhui Wang, Yate-Ching Yuan, Paul Frankel, Sierra Li, Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa, Guihua Sun, Yafan Wang, Robin Smith, Kim Robinson, Xiubao Ren, Shizhen Emily Wang

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been recently detected in the circulation of cancer patients, where they are associated with clinical parameters. Discovery profiling of circulating small RNAs has not been reported in breast cancer (BC), and was carried out in this study to identify blood-based small RNA markers of BC clinical outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 173 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 18%
Computer Science 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 43 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,413,245
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,226
of 3,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,473
of 156,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#22
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.