You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Combining structural and bioactivity-based fingerprints improves prediction performance and scaffold hopping capability
Journal of Cheminformatics, August 2019
Oliver Laufkötter, Noé Sturm, Jürgen Bajorath, Hongming Chen, Ola Engkvist
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||80%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||20%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||14||19%|
|Student > Master||14||19%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||16||21%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||7%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||4||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 348,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.