↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients
Published in
Critical Care, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc9420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Ignacio Monge García, Anselmo Gil Cano, Manuel Gracia Romero

Abstract

Hemodynamic resuscitation should be aimed at achieving not only adequate cardiac output but also sufficient mean arterial pressure (MAP) to guarantee adequate tissue perfusion pressure. Since the arterial pressure response to volume expansion (VE) depends on arterial tone, knowing whether a patient is preload-dependent provides only a partial solution to the problem. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of a functional evaluation of arterial tone by dynamic arterial elastance (Ea(dyn)), defined as the pulse pressure variation (PPV) to stroke volume variation (SVV) ratio, to predict the hemodynamic response in MAP to fluid administration in hypotensive, preload-dependent patients with acute circulatory failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 156 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 18%
Other 25 16%
Student > Postgraduate 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,480,801
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,165
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,990
of 192,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.