↓ Skip to main content

Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 410)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1071 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
867 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence
Published in
Population Health Metrics, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-7954-8-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P Boyle, Theodore J Thompson, Edward W Gregg, Lawrence E Barker, David F Williamson

Abstract

People with diabetes can suffer from diverse complications that seriously erode quality of life. Diabetes, costing the United States more than $174 billion per year in 2007, is expected to take an increasingly large financial toll in subsequent years. Accurate projections of diabetes burden are essential to policymakers planning for future health care needs and costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 867 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
China 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 834 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 130 15%
Student > Master 127 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 14%
Student > Bachelor 93 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 7%
Other 170 20%
Unknown 164 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 249 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 6%
Social Sciences 54 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 6%
Other 197 23%
Unknown 193 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#338,738
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#10
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#846
of 105,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.