You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Possible neurocognitive benefits of exercise in persons with heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s11556-015-0151-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Galioto, Andrew F. Fedor, John Gunstad |
| Abstract |
More than 6 million Americans have heart failure (HF) and more than 500,000 are diagnosed each year. In addition to its many adverse medical consequences, HF is also a significant risk factor for neurological disorders like Alzheimer's disease and associated with cognitive impairment long prior to the onset of these conditions. Converging bodies of literature suggest cognitive dysfunction in HF may be at least partially modifiable. One key mechanism for cognitive improvement is improved cerebral blood flow, which may be possible with exercise in patients with HF. This brief review provides a model for the likely neurocognitive benefits of exercise in HF and encourages further work in this area. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#21,415,544
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
#152
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,918
of 287,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.